Member Login

Safe Work Practices for the Aggregates Industry December 14, 2017
Make sure you're up to speed with the IHSA manual on safe work practices for the aggregates industry.
2018 OSSGA Conference and AGM at Deerhurst Resort December 11, 2017
The Ontario Stone, Sand & Gravel Association welcomes its members to Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ontario. Sharing our story and mastering our message is extremely important, and OSSGA has developed a conference agenda that will provide leadership, thought and guidance on doing just that. We have brought together an outstanding lineup of industry and keynote speakers combined with evening entertainment to deliver an impactful conference.
MNRF Finalizes Safe Harbour Habitat Policy December 1, 2017
The Safe Habour Habitat Policy has now been finalized and was broadened to include special concern species in addition to endangered and threatened species.
MPAC Update November 28, 2017
OSSGA has been advised that the Assessment Review Board (ARB) has issued procedural dates of February 2018 for the County of Wellington’s appeals on the current MPAC assessment, meaning that the procedural ‘timeline’ will commence at that point.
Niagara Region Aggregate Policies November 27, 2017
In 2014 Niagara Region initiated Phase 1 of a project to update the Region’s Official Plan policies for aggregate resources.
Development Approval Roundtable Action Plan November 26, 2017
In April 2017, Ontario announced a 16-point plan to help more people find affordable homes, increase supply, protect buyers and renters and bring stability to the real estate market.
Industry Recognition Awards - Thank You for Your Submissions! November 24, 2017
Thank you to all the producers who sent in submissions for our Industry Recognition Awards – our members keep pushing the bar higher and higher!

BackOSSGA News

MNRF Releases New Supply and Demand Study of Aggregate Resources for GGH

August 9, 2017 at 9:28 AM

On August 8, 2017, MNRF released a new study that it commissioned to update knowledge and information on aggregate resources in the Greater Golden Horseshoe.  The study was conducted in 2016 by Golder Associates Ltd. in  conjunction with MHBC Planning, Altus Group and Dionne Bacchus and Associates.

MNRF staff met with OSSGA in early August to introduce the study.  At that time, industry provided feedback indicating concern with respect to possible misinterpretation of the numbers within the study.  The executive summary of the study, which indicates potential remaining reserves of 2,792 million tonnes in 123 selected sand and gravel pits does indicate that “there is quite a high degree of uncertainty associated with this estimate and the results should not be taken as a very realistic indication of what resource may actually be proven and made available from these licensed sites.  While potential reserves exist in many parts of the Province there are concerns about scarcity of certain products in close to market locations that will lead to increased costs and environmental impacts associated with increased haul distance.”

That said, industry felt a stronger disclaimer should be attached to the study.  There is a danger that these numbers will be taken at face value without a true understanding of the geological uncertainties of the material.  A number of suggestions were made with respect to the Executive Summary.  While these were not adopted, MNRF included a transmittal letter when it released the study to further underscore the caution with which this report should be read.

Please find below excerpts from their letter of introduction to the survey and an executive summary which is attached.  A full copy of the report is available here.

Excerpt from MNRF letter of introduction to the study:

The Supply and Demand Study of Aggregate Resources Supplying the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), is now available.    
 
The purpose of the current study was to gain a better understanding of current aggregate resources by updating key parts of the 2010 State of the Aggregate Resource in Ontario (SAROS), including information related to demand, material supply, availability and transport of aggregates. The results of the report are intended to:

  • help inform both provincial and municipal government planning and policies in order to ensure a balanced approach to protecting Ontario’s resources, including aggregates; and,
  • assist aggregate operators in identifying longer term business approaches (e.g., recycling).  

This new study includes reserves and areas that were not included in the SAROS study parameters, namely estimated sand and gravel reserves and estimated reserves up to 100km outside of the GGH.  As highlighted in the report, these estimates must be taken with caution as the quality of material and reliability of information available varies. However, despite the uncertainty of these sand and gravel estimates, MNRF felt it important to include some analysis of this resource even if to serve as a baseline.  It is hoped that future studies will be able to corroborate the analysis performed in this study, or further refine methodologies to ensure more accurate estimates.
 
Consistent with the SAROS analysis, the constraint analysis in this most recent study does include some discussion of level (or strength) of constraint placed upon the resource.  Results included in the conclusion and Executive Summary however, focus on overall constraints on aggregate resources.  As identified in the report, while provincial policies include certain circumstances where a “constraint” may result in no permissible extraction of aggregate resources (e.g., Provincially Significant Wetland in eco regions 5E, 6E and 7E); the majority of constraints identified in the study simply illustrate that there is a greater test to be met before extraction may be considered in those areas.  In comparison, some “unconstrained” resources may still not be available for other reasons, such as viability of land size or land ownership.
 
It should also be noted that this study was completed in 2016, prior to the release of the updated Growth Plan 2017. While new policies (e.g. Agricultural System and Natural Heritage System) may change the level or type of constraint impacting aggregate resources within these areas, they are not anticipated to impact the overall percentage of constrained resources within the study area. 

To read the executive summary, please click here in English or French.

OSSGA members who would like a full copy of the report, please contact sarmstrong@ossga.com.